Our

Hydrogen

Future

 

 

(An Essay and Plays upon Solutions for the Most Pressing Issues of our Time)

 

 

 

"I believe that water will one day be employed as fuel, that hydrogen and oxygen which constitute it, used singly or together, will furnish an inexhaustible source of heat and light, of an intensity of which coal is not capable. I believe then that when the deposits of coal are exhausted, we shall heat and warm ourselves with water. Water will be the coal of the future."   Jules Vernes (1870) "L´île mystérieuse"

 

The announcement of a hydrogen fuel initiative in the President’s 2003 State of the Union speech substantially increased interest in the potential for hydrogen to play a major role in the nation’s long-term energy future. The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs (Free Executive Summary)  http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10922.html

 

 

 

 

Author: Arindam Banerjee

Adda Enterprises, Melbourne

22nd April 1007
The Hydrogen Transmission Network for the Integrated Management of Energy and Water Resources in Australia

 

 

Introduction

 

Living conditions in Australia are often dependent upon the caprice of Nature – the prolonged drought in recent years has caused enormous suffering in the rural areas, and undeniable discomfort in the cities, now suffering various water restrictions.  Current energy generation methods, for industrial, domestic and transportation use, mainly require the combustion of irreplaceable and increasingly expensive fossil fuels; these give rise to pollution, along with a host of adverse environmental effects and negative socio-political consequences.

 

Methods historically found sound and practical in the Western World (UK, Europe, USA) have been adopted wholesale in Australia, often with innovations.   For sustainability purposes, the unique nature of the Australian situation (dry climatic conditions; very large distances; concentration of the population within a few cities; difficulties in transportation in terms of fuel, access and time; enormous oceanic, solar and uranium resources; extraordinary mining, farming and tourism potential; a small but resourceful population) necessitates original thinking tuned and tailored to suit the particular Australian needs, and serve Australian interests, while at the same time maintaining and improving the environment.  With the new approaches introduced in this monograph, it will be perfectly possible for Australia to set far higher and better standards in energy and water management, with well-known and tried methods.  They will exalt the already high living standards in this country, and also win for Australia international admiration along with the desire for emulation.  Australia would receive an honourable leadership position in matters relating to global economic development without increasing pollution – a most important concern for all the huge emerging economies.

 

This paper first presents the structure of a visionary “dream solution” to the problems mentioned in the preceding paragraph, as the framework for a future National Policy for Integrated Management of the Energy and Water Resources in Australia.  Second, it presents the details, at a level comprehensible to the lay person, of the fundamentals of the new method for the proposed solution, and the nature of its lasting impact upon Australian households and communities.  Third, it outlines plans of action, for implementation.  For the sake of attracting public interest, this is done in the form of four short plays.
Features of The Dream Solution

 

The “Dream Solution” to be outlined in the next section will have the following features:

 

  1. Novelty, Simplicity and Clarity.  Every person in Australia will be able to appreciate and understand the new aspects, and their relevance. 

 

  1. Environmental Friendliness.  The environment will never be adversely affected by this scheme.  The environment will be progressively benefited with the phasing out of current energy and water management schemes, with the “dream solution”.

 

  1. Political Acceptability.  It is not possible to think of any reason why any Australian political party or group will oppose the “dream solution”, as the benefits will be so enormous.

 

  1. Technical Feasibility.  The “dream solution” is eminently practical and certainly possible, given the political will, that under any reasonable government should be forthcoming.  The key technologies involved in it have been long understood.  While there remains immense scope for further research, for efficiency and cost reduction purposes, the key components for the scheme can be purchased “off the shelf”. 

 

  1.  Upgradeability.  There is an unlimited scope for upgradeability and expansion, for the “dream solution”, while allowing the graceful degradation (or necessary upkeep) of existing energy and water management schemes.

 

  1. No loss. The transmission losses for energy and water, in the “dream solution” will be practically zero.

 

  1. Compatibility.  The “dream solution” is perfectly compatible with the existing and future energy generation industries: fossil fuel combustion, nuclear, solar, tidal, wind, bio-mass, etc.

 

  1. High safety.  It will be possible to construct nuclear plants far away from dense human habitation, as the transmission losses relating to energy transport will be zero.  The incorporation of fail-safe switching devices will also enhance safety.

 

  1. Real Estate Appreciation.  A comprehensive and limitless greening of the Australian continent will be possible with the “dream solution”.  This will have an enormously positive aspect on all Australian real estate values.

 

  1. Investment of International Capital.  The upward drive of real estate values will cause the flow of investment capital into Australia, for the funding of the “dream solution”.

 

  1. Employment Potential.  Very many real jobs will be created for real work, that will benefit present and future Australians.

 

  1. Aesthetic aspects.  It should not be necessary to create lossy, unaesthetic and environmentally unfriendly structures such as windfarms, more fossil fuel burning or processing structures, lossy canal systems for water movements.  The transmission of energy and water will be relatively unobtrusive.

 

  1. Pinpoint transmission.  Exactly where, and wherever, the energy and water is required, for family or community use, it can be sent with minimal cost and no transmission loss. 

 

  1. Broadband Telecommunications.  Fibre optic communication, for high-speed broadband for Internet and other communications can be added on for a marginal cost, even in remote areas.

 

  1. Stable Costs.  The energy and water costs can be expected to be highly stable, as all the inputs involved will be under the control of the Australian Government.

 

  1. Economics of Scale.  With increasing volume of production, and progressively sophisticated technologies, the costs involved can be expected to diminish with time.

 

  1. Independent of Time. There will be no time-wise cut-off point for the “dream solution”, as renewable energy generation schemes will be increasingly used.

 

  1. Low Costs. The construction capital costs, and even the labour costs for the “dream solution” will be very low as compared to the existing schemes.

 

  1. Environment-friendly transportation.  A revolution in transportation technology can be effected, for further environmental improvement.

 

  1. Research Work.  A great deal of research work relating to the “dream solution” has already been done.

 

  1. Tailored for Australia.  The “dream solution” takes into primary consideration the unique aspects of the nature of the country, and the quality of civilization: large distances, deserts, localized population densities, large uranium resources, plentiful availability of solar power and sea-water, superb infrastructure, strong community-based ethos, forceful Government initiatives.

 

As the “dream solution” proposed by Adda Enterprises has twenty-one excellent features as stated above, it can thus deserve to be called the dream solution for Australian energy and water resources management.  How each feature will be incorporated, will be shown, implicitly or explicitly, in the following sections.


The Basis for the Dream Solution, in Two Words

 

The basis for the Dream Solution has already been stated by none less than Mr. George Bush, the President of the United States of America.  In 2003, he set his country – and the world – on the course of the Hydrogen Economy.  [Reference 5]

 

Enormous US funding has been poured into research and development as a consequence.  Many new findings related to the generation, storage, distribution and use of hydrogen, as the environment-friendly fuel for the future, have been made and are available for perusal on the Internet.  There seems little doubt that the Hydrogen Economy is at the very least one way to proceed, for future energy requirements.  However, there are serious issues – particularly the fact that more energy is required to form Hydrogen than the energy the generated Hydrogen will release – that are hampering the development of the Hydrogen Economy.  The lack of a clear development path for the Hydrogen Economy, (as a result of so far unfocussed thought processes, and the lobbying of various competing interest groups) in Europe, USA, and other developed countries, makes it all the more necessary for Australia – a land with unique attributes - to take up a healthy leadership position, as a response to the vision of President Bush, on this vital matter.  [References 1, 2, 3, 4]

 

The lack of realization of the pollution-free Hydrogen Economy, in Europe and USA, stems from the sole concentration of the pioneers in this field, upon the energy aspects.  The energy market is vital, competitive and controversial, and fraught with environmental issues.  Replacing fossil fuel with hydrogen for energy purposes is a top priority for the environment and permanence; substantial research and development funds have been invested so far; however, the question of a side-effect extremely important in the Australian context, namely, water, is completely overlooked.  Water is plentiful in most parts of UK, USA and Europe.  Such is not the case with Australia – here, in most of the brown, barren, dry continent the conditions are similar to Saudi Arabia where desalination plants are in common use.  However, in oil-rich but water-poor countries, the Hydrogen Economy is bad news as it will diminish their export earnings, and so, is not likely to be encouraged in the near future.

 

Geographical and climatic factors, thus, necessarily propel Australia to take a leadership position on the issue of the Hydrogen Economy. Australia needs both energy and water for the power and greenery vital for increasing civilization – and cheap broadband access, for Internet and other telecommunications, is the proverbial icing on the cake.


 

The Dream Solution

 

The following statement presents in one line the new method proposed by Adda Enterprises, and Adda Enterprises reserves all rights, including copyright and patent rights, that will follow from the discussion and incorporation of the new method.  Adda Enterprises hereby grants the right to any interested party to communicate this method, and the related discussions presented in this paper, in any medium, for public interest, and strictly for non-commercial purposes only.

 

Water (usually of salty or brackish origin) is converted to hydrogen and oxygen, through a variety of conventional and futuristic energy generation schemes and other means; the generated hydrogen is piped to various destinations, for the production of energy and pure water, on a more-or-less continuous, ongoing basis.

 

 

We will now go into more detailed discussions about the words and phrases employed in the “dream solution”, in order to show its power and relevance, chiefly in the Australian context.   Australia-type situations, in other parts of the world, are also naturally addressed.

 

“Water (usually of salty or brackish origin)”:  The seas and oceans around Australia contain unlimited amounts of salty water, available at no cost!  There are also many inland seas, and ground water reserves, in the interior of the continent.  This water is the primary input to the “dream solution”.

 

“is converted to hydrogen and oxygen”:  A molecule of water is composed of two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen.  There are basically two different industrial processes, very well established, that break up the constituents of water into hydrogen and oxygen.  The hydrogen is for use; oxygen produced should be released into the atmosphere, as we shall see, for balance. Appendix 1 goes into some details, along with references.

 

“through a variety of conventional and futuristic energy generation schemes and other means”:  Australia’s main strengths for non-fossil-fuel based and renewable energy sourcs and nuclear and solar, as Australia has large uranium deposits and receives enormous solar power.  The main problems with them relate to uneconomical electrical transmission losses when they are situated far away from the usage sites, and political issues with the nuclear option when the nuclear plants are near dense human habitation. Most energy being used today comes from the combustion of fossil fuels creating Carbon Dioxide (and other environmentally unfriendly gases).  However, fossil fuels such as coal can be burnt to create producer gas, and hydrogen is a component of producer gas.  Hydrogen can also be formed from biological means. 

 

“the generated hydrogen is piped to various destinations”:  This is the most crucial and original clause in the Dream Solution.  Transmission of gas for lighting was very much in vogue in the nineteenth and early twentieth century – with advances in electric technology, it fell out of use.  The Dream Solution is a comeback for gas, with certain novelties as: pure hydrogen to be piped instead of coal-gas; interaction with electricity generation at various stages; pure water as a desirable co-product.  The great advantages for the use of this new insight to suit modern needs will be elaborated upon in the next section.  At this stage we note that transmission of hydrogen gas by non-leaky pipes is loss-free, and so, intrinsically independent of distance.  It is also far cheaper and far less unsightly, as well as less obtrusive, than High Voltage lines.  Further, the distribution system is very flexible, and comparatively easy to understand and maintain.  Piping hydrogen is a tried technology: [Reference 1].  However, in this reference we shall find that this piping was something one-off, specifically to meet the needs of the nearby Chlorine industry.  Adda Enterprises, in this paper, is trying to expand the scope of piping hydrogen on a much vaster scale.

 

“for the production of energy and pure water”:  Energy from hydrogen is formed most efficiently by a device known as the fuel cell.  It could also be formed by combustion with oxygen, a process that releases a great amount of heat.  A modified version of the ancient steam engine (where instead of huge supplies of water and a chamber for burning coal or wood, we have hydrogen injection in a cylinder when it burns with atmospheric oxygen, to form steam that drives the piston of the steam engine) should be small, and be the drive for an electric motor to generate electricity.  The pure water formed from the condensation process should be stored, and this is the vital and extra side-product so eminently suitable for the needs of the Australian situation.

 

“on a more-or-less continuous basis”:  This is the truly novel aspect of the plan, apart from the integrity existing in the totality of its construction.  Current hydrogen production schemes stress greatly upon the storage of the generated hydrogen.  It is the difficulties relating to the transportation of the stored hydrogen, which is seen as a major drawback to the implementation of the Hydrogen Economy.  When hydrogen is not stored at all (except for special purposes) on the whole, but directly converted to energy and water at the required destinations, after piping it using the Hydrogen Transmission Network, all the problems and costs relating to storage and transportation are averted.

 

Ultimately, then, the Dream Solution is a great desalination process which also works as a flexible and relatively lossless energy transfer system.

 

Vehicles running on hydrogen naturally need the highest energy conversion efficiencies – and this has been the main focus for research.  Fuel cells give the greatest efficiencies.  Hydrogen combustion with pure oxygen also gives high efficiencies – but the temperatures involved are very high.  Combustion in ordinary air, in the presence of water is not so efficient, but a lot cheaper; where pure water is at least as important as energy generation, inefficient combustion processes of hydrogen to form water is certainly desirable under many situations, especially in the arid Australian context. 

 

Piping hydrogen for water formation has many advantages over conventional methods for water transport: no evaporation loss as happens in canals; much thinner pipes are required as hydrogen combines with nine times its weight of the oxygen in the air, so only one-ninth the weight of the water need be supported; no need for any pumping uphill as Hydrogen is a very light gas and so can climb to any height naturally ; constant and reliable monitoring systems which could shut down the flow in case of a leak; easier maintenance. 

 

The surplus energy at the destination, could be converted to electricity, and fed back to the local electrical power company.  Every household or community in the Hydrogen Economy could thus become a supplier of electric power (in addition to being a consumer) at certain times.  The oxygen balance is maintained – the oxygen used to create water, at the destination, is equal to the oxygen released to the atmosphere earlier. 

 

Certain aspects of the economics involved in the proposed hydrogen transmission, from the users’ perspective, are enlarged upon in the plays “The Sale” and “A Meeting of Minds” presented later in this paper. The References and Quotations section contain information about the current stage of the Hydrogen Economy, and have urls to a great deal of technical information. Here it is relevant to note that whatever the current production costs and sale price may be, given the facts relevant to Australia (to repeat, scope for many nuclear plants, all distant from human habitation; enormous opportunities with solar power) the costs cannot but come down, with mass production techniques deriving from heavy and increasing demand, and increasingly efficient technical processes arising from further research to improve present practices.  That would be consistent with most industrial products and practices.  In the fifties the first IBM hard disk drive had to be transported by an airplane, it was that large!  And its memory capacity was – five megabytes!  Today we have gigabyte drives that weigh only a few grams.  So, whatever the price of hydrogen may be now, it is bound to come down progressively when it is popularly realized that the piping of hydrogen for both water and energy at all needed destinations, is the best possible solution for balancing the needs of the environment with the ever-growing needs of civilization.

 

 


The Benefits from the Dream Solution

 

The environment will be the chief beneficiary from the Dream Solution, as this is the stable and lasting path to greenery and resulting happiness, leading to: greater production of food without need to cut down more forests and harm wildlife; benefits to farm animals; a lower rate of depletion of fossil fuels that could be put to more useful purposes such as the making of plastics and drugs; human population in hitherto unlivable areas; the decrease of greenhouse gases leading to greater health with a better formed ozone layer, less melting of polar ice, and less erratic climatic conditions.

 

While it may be expected that most environmental agencies should be satisfied with the Dream Solution, the Nuclear Industry should be thoroughly elated.  The construction of nuclear plants far away from dense human habitation should be politically more acceptable than having them close to cities, as must be the case if power losses from transmission have to be minimized.  However, the touchy issue of hazardous nuclear waste remains – in the Australian context this is less of an issue than in most countries, as the nuclear waste can be buried in the vast uninhabited deserts.  The solar power industry, along with other alternative energy generation industries, will get potentially huge markets.  The gas pipe laying industries, which will be crucial for laying the pipes necessary for this new form of energy and water transmission, will be similarly benefited. 

 

It may be thought that the oil industry will be upset by this new approach, but in fact the Dream Solution will work to their benefit.  With less oil used for fuel, the existing reserves will last longer, and that would mean that the oil industry would last longer.  Increasingly the oil pumped out will be used for plastics and related industries.  Similarly, the coal reserves would last longer, and be used to make hydrogen primarily.

 

Farmers in the drought or drought-prone areas should be those most ready to welcome the Dream Solution, as it will provide them with an assured supply of water and power, independent of weather or climatic conditions. They could thus have a far better planned, and assured, business approach. With the improvement of their situation, as the primary industries will be the first to be directly benefited, the small towns will find better business, and the population and capital drift to the big cities should be arrested.  Secondary industries (banking, insurance, entertainment, industrial production) will be in a better position to make a strong comeback.  This will definitely impact favourably upon the real estate prices in the country areas, creating a virtuous cycle for growth, as further loans could be available with the increased equity. 

 

With less pollution, and more water in the cities, the living conditions will definitely improve.  People may learn once again the joy of taking a proper shower, or a long hot bath – recently, strict water restrictions have made these not just luxuries, but pleasures morally unattainable.  Gardens can once again be watered properly, and the turf and swimming-pool industries may once again have their day.

 

In the ensuing Hydrogen Future, it is perfectly conceivable to think of much-improved (for safety, comfort and speed) airships lifted and run by Hydrogen to link Las Vegas type oases in the presently uninhabited deserts!  What scope for tourism and the hospitality industry!

 

Enormous financial investment, engineering expertise, and manpower need to be put in to make the Dream Solution a reality.  Without major Government or Government-supported initiatives, work of this size and scope is unimaginable.  However much the amounts spent, the unlimited and ever-increasing demand for the end products – energy and water – will make the amounts spent worthwhile, as they can be recovered over time.  Many new communities will be created; existing communities will increase in size and affluence; the position for repayment will consequently improve with the enlargement of the taxation base.

 

It is not just that Australia alone will benefit from the Dream Solution – all desert areas (in Africa, the Middle East, India and China, the US) may be converted to greenery with the Dream Solution.  Australia’s standing in the international community will be greatly enhanced with a pioneering role.  With the availability of energy, water, and good communications, in the dry, neglected areas of the planet, standards of living will improve immensely; there should be less competition and strife, and consequently, less violence.

 

The social and economic issues relevant to the Hydrogen Future are further outlined in the next part of this work, which consists of four one-scene plays.  It is expected that the powerful medium of drama should be the most effective in communicating the basic ideas and goals of the Hydrogen Future to a very wide cross-section of the world’s population.  The author urges the concerned multilingual people, who may approve of his work, to translate the plays – and also, this essay! - into other languages.

 

 


 

References and Quotations:

 

Reference 1: http://www.hyweb.de/Knowledge/w-i-energiew-eng.html 

Issue : 8.7.1996

Authors: Dr. Werner Zittel, Reinhold Wurster

Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH

 

Excerpt:

4.3.1 Transport of CGH2

 

Compressed hydrogen is these days delivered from producer to consumer in mobile compressed tanks using trucks or trains. Alternatively it can be supplied via a pipeline distribution network to which multiple suppliers and consumers are attached.

 

Road transport is carried out using trucks carrying steel bottles at 20 MPa with each vehicle carrying about 2400 - 3600 Nm3.

 

In Germany there are two large hydrogen distribution networks: One in the Ruhrgebiet that is operated by BOC Gases under contract for Hüls AG and one in the industrial area Leuna-Bitterfeld-Wolfen operated by Linde. Both networks have over 50 km of pipeline and have been operating without major problem for over 50 years with pressures of 2 MPa. There are also several smaller hydrogen pipelines of other firms in service. As well as for internal use these pipelines usually serve to connect nearby producers (usually from the chlorine industry) and consumers. There is a wealth of operating experience in connection with hydrogen. The hydrogen network in the Ruhrgebiet is supplied by multiple producers (also mainly from the chlorine industry). Linde’s hydrogen network is predominantly supplied by a single natural gas reformer with 35000 Nm3/h capacity (corresponding to a yearly capacity of 280 Million Nm3/a) as well as chemical producers from the Bitterfeld region.

 

 

Reference 2:  http://www.princeton.edu/~chm333/2004/Hydrogen/intro.html

 

Excerpt: While the goal of this website is not to curb the enthusiasm for hydrogen, we do wish to break through the hype and promote a more realistic picture of the challenges, benefits, and drawbacks of establishing a Hydrogen Economy. This new economy will use hydrogen gas as an energy currency. We will examine the production of hydrogen from renewable and non-renewable resources, the storage and infrastructure requirements of a hydrogen based economy, the use of hydrogen in power plants, cars, and small electronics, the benefits and possible damage to the atmosphere hydrogen could cause, and the enthusiasm shown by governments around the world for hydrogen technologies.

 

Reference 3:  http://www.princeton.edu/~chm333/2004/Hydrogen/conclusions.htm

 

Excerpt: More than anything else, we hope that this website gives an understanding of the complexity of the Hydrogen Economy. In order for hydrogen to operate as a working energy currency, markets must be developed for the production, applications, storage and infrastructure for hydrogen. The main environmental benefits are the atmospheric effects a Hydrogen Economy would produce. However, measuring these benefits is difficult because a great amount of uncertainty exists about the magnitude and even the direction of the effect of hydrogen on the atmosphere.

 

The sheer scale of the Hydrogen Economy suggests that government involvement may be a necessary for its success. Many countries around the world are busily investigating and experimenting with the use of hydrogen as a replacement for fossil fuels as an energy currency.

 

However, the establishment of a hydrogen economy requires the development of hydrogen technology and infrastructure. Hydrogen currently costs more per gallon equivalent of gasoline, but this cost could come down with the development of a cost efficient production system. In addition to a production system, a hydrogen economy needs reliable transportation and storage systems. The challenge arises from moving and containing nature's lightest weight gas without compromising its purity. Moreover, some scientists have brought up questions about hydrogen's environmental virtues.

 

The enthusiasm shown by governments from several countries suggests that, for better or worse, hydrogen will be affecting us in the coming decades. As such, it is imperative that we understand what is required for the Hydrogen Economy to reach fruition and the limitations hydrogen may have. In this way, we can invest wisely in the future rather than depending on the promises of politicians, entrepreneurs, and philosophers.

 

Reference 4: Possible Structure of Hydrogen Economy. Source:  http://www.ch2bc.org/

 

Reference 5: The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs (Free Executive Summary)

http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10922.html

 

Brief: The announcement of a hydrogen fuel initiative in the President’s 2003 State of the Union speech substantially increased interest in the potential for hydrogen to play a major role in the nation’s long-term energy future. Prior to that event, DOE asked the National Research Council to examine key technical issues about the hydrogen economy to assist in the development of its hydrogen R&D program. Included in the assessment were the current state of technology; future cost estimates; CO2 emissions; distribution, storage, and end use considerations; and the DOE RD&D program. The report provides an assessment of hydrogen as a fuel in the nation’s future energy economy and describes a number of important challenges that must be overcome if it is to make a major energy contribution. Topics covered include the hydrogen end-use technologies, transportation, hydrogen production technologies, and transition issues for hydrogen in vehicles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Four Plays

 

We will now present scripts for four short plays outlining the way the Hydrogen Economy could be introduced into suburban, community and farm areas.   These plays are set in the time period 2007-2010 AD.

 

The Sale

 

Dramatis Personae

 

Mr. Black                     House Owner

Bob                              Hydrogen Salesperson

 

(Suburban Area, 2010 AD.  Bob has door-knocked at Mr. Black’s residence, and is now in the parlour)

 

Bob:     Good morning, sir.  I am Bob, and I represent Hydrogen Australia.  As you may have heard, we are now in the process of delivering the Hydrogen Solution to every household.  I am here to tell you about the services we offer.

 

Mr. Black: Good morning, Bob.  I have my doubts about this Hydrogen solution.  For one thing, is it safe?  I have heard that Hydrogen is very explosive.  Like, the airships used to catch fire and blow up quite easily, when they were filled with Hydrogen.

 

Bob:     Safety is our primary concern, sir.  Modern control techniques have fail-safe switches – as soon as there is a leak, even the slightest, the supply is cut off and a possible explosion is thus averted.  The Hydrogen solution is no more dangerous than the gas supply you already have at your house.  These gas switches are similar to the electricity safety switch at your meter box.  We have come a long way since those airship disasters.

 

Mr. Black: So what are you proposing?

 

Bob:     Hydrogen Australia will lay a gas pipe to your building, similar to the one you already have for your cooking and heating, but with superior safety and control features.  There will be a converter system on your premises that will convert your supply of hydrogen to electricity and water.  Our research shows that for reasonable comfort the average suburban household needs about four hundred liters of water per day.  As you know, what with the current water restrictions, you have to pay enormously to the Water Board for usages of over two hundred liters per day.  And these charges are going to increase, and keep on increasing, in the foreseeable future.  Now, let us say you get your quota of two hundred liters from the Board, and want to use two hundred liters more.  You need to buy only about twenty-five kilograms of Hydrogen from us, per day.  That will turn into a little over two hundred liters (or kilograms) of water, by combining with the much heavier oxygen in the atmosphere.  You will also get a great deal of electrical energy, far more than your daily needs.  You can sell that electricity to the electric distribution company, for a refund.

 

Mr. Black  (excitedly):  You mean I get lots of water and also free electricity – even a cheque maybe from the electricity suppliers?

 

Bob:  Yes, sir.  We have a special deal with them.   They are coming to the conclusion that it is best that electricity is produced without pollution in every home, with use of hydrogen.  That will cut down the need for them to burn carbon.  In fact, they are going to be our major suppliers of hydrogen, till the nuclear and then finally the solar sources come to play.

 

Mr. Black:  I am very interested.  Assured water, money from electricity, and perfect for the environment!  It seems too good to be true.

 

Bob (smiles):  It is a new idea, sir, proposed by an Australian, which has been widely embraced.  They are ecstatic about it in the country towns.

 

Mr, Black:  Yes, I have heard of that.  But how much will it cost?

 

Bob:     At present our hydrogen costs are still a bit steep, but I assure you sir, that they will come down steadily with time, with increased production.  We have new mass-scale production techniques for Hydrogen.  More importantly there is this very new idea of piping Hydrogen for combustion directly at the destination, instead of the expensive storage and transportation. So the prices are now only about a tenth of what they used to be before. You will be charged forty cents for every kilogram of Hydrogen, which means that your daily cost will be ten dollars, and the monthly cost will be three hundred dollars.  Then there is a monthly charge of a hundred dollars for the installation and hardware costs, but that too will decrease over time.  There are various Government incentives relating to tax reductions and rebates, which should mean that you ultimately you would be paying around three hundred and seventy five dollars per month. 

 

Mr. Black:  Three hundred and seventy five dollars per month!  Now that’s a lot of money.  I cannot afford it.

 

Bob:  Sir, we have started out with a no-money-loss but increased-comfort policy for the customer. Your present energy costs for gas and electricity are one hundred and thirty dollars a month, and your water costs will be fifty dollars a month less for the extra two hundred liters per day that you won’t have to pay for.  With the current Government attitudes for penalizing heavy water users, the water costs may go up indefinitely, just like taxation on cigarette prices.  You would sell your surplus electricity, and that in our estimate that should not be less than two hundred dollars per month. 

 

Mr. Black:  I did not understand that last bit. Exactly how can I sell my surplus electricity?

 

Bob: This is the question almost everyone asks!  I have here a small worksheet which Mr. Banerjee created, using information from his recent gas, water, and electricity bills.  To get two hundred liters of water a day, he needed twenty-five kilograms of hydrogen.  Now, twenty five kilograms of hydrogen would give him, conservatively, around seven hundred and fifty kilowatthours of energy every day.  Now, his informative gas and electricity bills told him that his daily energy needs were thirty-seven kilowatthours, or only 5% of the energy he would generate.  The bills also said that his daily energy cost was $2.26.  Mr. Banerjee figured that if he could sell the surplus electricity he would generate, at the rate he was paying, he would make nineteen times $2.26 per day, or say over twelve hundred dollars a month!  Now that is rather more than the two hundred dollars I was talking about.  When you will be burning your hydrogen, you will be producing the surplus electrical energy which will feed into the electricity grid – at other times, you will be drawing power from the grid.  We control the combustion schedules, for evenness of distribution.  When most people start to provide the surplus, in the cities and the suburbs, they will not be lighting each other up – they will be powering the industry.

 

Mr Black:  Ah, I see.

 

Bob: So, in our view you should not, rather, can not lose financially even now.  You will definitely gain much more in the long run, as the hydrogen prices will go down, and the water and energy costs from traditional sources will go up.  And as you know, with water presently it is not so much the price, as its availability.  When did you last have a long comfortable hot water bath in your expensive spa?

 

Mr. Black (smiles ruefully):  I cannot remember.  Why, I cannot even remember when I last took a proper shower. 

 

Bob:     There you are!  There isn’t much life without water, sir.  The water shortage will not improve the property values, if certain necessary measures are not taken.  To maintain and improve real estate prices, we must have the Hydrogen Future.  The sooner we all start, the better. 

 

Mr. Black:  Where do I have to sign?

 


Hydrogen goes Bush

 

Dramatis Personae

 

Mrs. Smith                   Mayor

Alice                            Hydrogen Australian Representative

Mr. Ryan                      Councilor

Mr. Bugsy                    Entrepreneur

 

(Setting: Small Country Town.  In the mayoral office, 2009 AD)

 

Mr. Ryan:  Here we are, all excited here about the Hydrogen Future.  From what is known, it seems exactly the right thing for us.

 

Alice (smiles):  Indeed, Mr. Ryan.  The small country towns have been the most enthusiastic about the Hydrogen Future, as they know they will get an assured supply of water and energy.

 

Mrs. Smith:  So what do you propose for us?

 

Alice:  We will lay a hydrogen pipe to your township, which will supply you with both your energy and water requirements.  That will be a two hundred kilometer long pipe, and we will bear the installation costs provided we agree upon the quantities and costs.  We shall install a water tank, and efficient converters.  As you may know, they could be of the steam-engine combustion type or the fuel cell combustion type.  There are differences in costs involved in either processes, and there are tradeoffs in terms of primary water needs or primary energy needs.  So basically you end up with an electricity generator on top of a water tank.  This will function as long as the hydrogen keeps on coming.  You buy the hydrogen from us, and then sell the electricity and water to your township.

 

Mrs. Smith:  And this hydrogen – where is it coming from?

 

Alice:  From the ocean, and fossil or nuclear and ultimately solar power.  We have nuclear power plants, and are building larger and larger solar farms, that convert the seawater to hydrogen, while releasing the oxygen to the atmosphere.  We release the oxygen there, you combine the same quantity of oxygen with the hydrogen, here.

 

Mr. Ryan:  So the supply can be endless?

 

Alice:  Indeed.  And there is no pollution either.  Or rather, increasingly less pollution with decreasing use of fossil and nuclear fuel.

 

Mrs. Smith:  Thank goodness! 

 

Mr Ryan:  A lot of jobs have been created because of all the work involved in the construction and laying of the Hydrogen Network.  We expect many more jobs to be created.  Primary industry seems to be the biggest gainer. However, it looks like we can get a fair industry too, with availability of cheap electricity, water and of course development of  real estate.  Banking, insurance and retail will follow on their heels.  Hydrogen will slowly displace petrol for transportation, and distance will become less of a factor.

 

Mrs. Smith:  The population shift to the major cities has been reversed, now.  Real estate prices have been rising satisfactorily.

 

Mr. Bugsy:  You know, this country is full of deserts, and we could be looking at lots of Las Vegas type places here.  Yes!  We could introduce slow airships to go from one site to another.

 

Alice:  Indeed, the possibilities are endless.  What you suggest, could lead to ultimately all the deserts turning green.  Even the Sahara, one day, will once again turn green and fertile.

 

Mrs. Smith:  Now won’t that we a worthy thing to do, for the coming generations!

 


 

Hydrogen Stationed

 

Dramatis Personae

 

Mr. Legg          Station Owner

Mrs. Legg        Mr. Legg’s wife

James               Hydrogen Australia representative

 

(Setting: Outback Station, 2008 AD.  On the verandah of the Legg residence)

 

Mr. Legg:  I still cannot believe it!  All these years, we have suffered so much because of the drought, and now, this miracle of a solution!

 

Mrs. Legg:  I too cannot believe it.  It seems too good to be true.  Please tell us about it, again.

 

James:  With pleasure, Mrs. Legg.  Hydrogen Australia will run a hydrogen gas pipeline to your station.  Now, you can branch off your supply of hydrogen to various areas, as necessary.  There, you convert your hydrogen to electricity and water.  You may need the electricity to sink wells, and pump out the ground water, for even more water.  Of course, you can use the electricity for lots of other uses – to run machinery, for instance.  You could use the hydrogen to power all transport in your station, in the not very distant future.   But I am betting that the assured supply of water, that you will get, will appeal most to you.  And mind you, this water – absolutely pure - could be stored in an above-ground tank, thus free from contamination, or evaporation. For the converter will sit on top of this tank, you see.  You won’t need any extra energy to send the hydrogen up there, it is the lightest thing on earth and is perfectly capable of rising to any height just by itself.

 

Mrs. Legg:  I think I have understood.  What this means is, that our livestock will never have to die of thirst.

 

Mr. Legg:  And we could cultivate so much more.

 

James:  You may be interested to know that, with so much more interest in the rural areas now, property prices all around have started to rise at a phenomenal rate.  Your equity will increase with the Hydrogen Future.  That will help you to get more loans.  The economy will keep on growing at a steady and healthy rate for the foreseeable future.  And you could congratulate yourselves, for being among the pioneers in saving the Earth from the pollution resulting from the burning of fossil fuels.

 

 

 

 

A meeting of minds

 

Dramatis Personae

 

Mr. Sen                        UN Representative

Niblet                           Representative, Environmental Interests

Mr. Doyle                    Representative, Oil interests

Mrs. Cole                     Representative, Coal Interests

M. Perrier                    Representative, Nuclear Interests

Ms. Bolar                     Representative, Solar Power Interests

Miss Ito                        Representative, Agricultural Interests

Ms. Amelina                 Representative, Transportation Interests

Mr. Myer                     Representative, Financial Interests

Mrs. Chen                    Hydrogen Australia Technical Specialist

 

(Setting: Conference Room, United Nations, Geneva, late 2007 AD.  Mr. Sen, the UN representative, is the Chairman.)

 

Mr. Sen:  Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to this meeting.  As you know, we will be discussing the consequences of the brilliant proposal for the realization of the Hydrogen Future, as proposed by one Mr. Arindam Banerjee.  I am proud to say that I come from the country he originates from – India.  His plan for the continuous piping and combustion of hydrogen, through a Hydrogen Transmission Network, for energy and water formation, is wildly popular, and seems to have been accepted everywhere, with almost lightning speed.  In all the major cities of the world, common people have taken to the streets in massive numbers, in support, and are demanding action.  Most politicians have bowed to such outpouring of public will.  So far, no scientist of note has managed to find any fundamental fallacy in his astounding yet very simple proposal.  In this meeting, we will first of all discuss how practical it is, and then if we decide it indeed it so, we will proceed to talk about how it will impact upon the interests of the major business groups.  Also we have with us an African person who would like to be known simply as Niblet.  He represents those who give primacy to environmental issues.  Niblet – the floor is yours.

 

Niblet:  I thank you, Mr. Chairman.  It is an honour for me to speak on such an important occasion.  I personally speak for those who have been nearly driven to extinction.  I mean all those who are called stone-age people.   For hundreds of thousands of years we have lived in peace. We love the environment.  We feel we are loved by the environment, every moment, in return.  We rejoice in the grace provided by the sun and the moon, the wind and the stars.  Our dancing is inspired by the movements of the free and the wild.  We respect all wildlife – when we kill them it is only for our own survival. Unfortunately, our way of life was found to be inferior, and our own selves to be as animals, by the visitors from Europe, whom we initially treated as gods.  We have lost our lives by the tens of millions. Our lands have been violently taken away from us, to serve their needs. Worst of all, our sense of complete joy, resulting in the love of and from Nature, which was the most precious gift to us from our ancestors, is nearly lost.  Fortunately for me, I am one of those few who still possess it.  Those unnatural people who hunted us down, and who are now spoiling the world for their own egos, gains and conveniences, cannot understand it.  However, not all among them are equally cruel, narrow and small-minded.  Those not finding solace from the pleasures and goals of materialism, hedonism, snobbery, religious cults and drugs are increasingly turning to environmentalism.  I am here to represent them.  My constituents have a strong revulsion to the pollution that is being caused by the oil, coal and nuclear industries.  Global warming from the emission of greenhouse gases is now a real issue.   Climatic conditions are changing drastically.  Weather patterns are becoming increasingly irregular and unpredictable, with disastrous consequences for food growers. Rise in sea levels will affect humanity drastically, with more people being forced to live on less land. The oil and coal industries have to shoulder a great deal of responsibility for this.  We need a completely new approach to life, and living.

 

Mr. Doyle:   Mr. Chairman, I am very much moved by Niblet’s speech.  He has touched upon by far the most shameful chapters of human history.  Unfortunately, the past cannot be undone.  All we can do is try out best not to distort it with indifference and misrepresentation.  Instead, we must learn sound lessons from our mistakes, for a better future.  I represent the oil interests.  Oil companies have contributed a great deal to humanity.  We have made transportation possible over great distances, cheaply and safely.  Our products are used in a great range of industries, to produce a near-unlimited range of useful products: from perfumes to pharmaceuticals; from plastics to domestic cooking fuels. The whole modern economic structure is based upon oil, and oil prices.  Environmentalists may well blame oil companies for pollution. But, just try to ban any of our products – just pass a law against selling petrol, say – and then see what will happen!  In first world countries our popularity beats the environmentalists by a factor of at least ten to one.

 

Mrs. Cole:  I endorse what Mr. Doyle just said.  I represent the coal interests.  We have been around longer than the oil industry.  We are primarily responsible for the Industrial Revolution, which has shaped the world we live in.  Today most of the power generated comes from burning coal.  Yes, people will demonstrate against the emission of greenhouse gases, but can they live with power cuts?  No!

 

M. Perrier:  Mr. Chairman, Mr. Doyle and Mrs. Cole are evading the key issue of pollution.  Pollution is an inevitable and also increasingly unacceptable by-product of the oil and coal industries.  True, they have made many technological improvements over the years, but the huge increases in the volumes that are burnt have outweighed the gains from efficiency. Now with India and China, with their vast populations trying to match the first-world living standards, the outlook from the perspective of increased pollution, is even bleaker.  I represent the nuclear interests.  Nuclear power does not create greenhouse gases.  It does not lead to global warming, or the ever-increasing hole in the ozone layer.  France, where I come from, generates nearly ninety percent of its power from nuclear reactors.  We have made great strides in containing the hazardous nuclear wastes.  We do set a precedent for the world to follow.  I must protest against any clubbing of our most modern nuclear industry with the wasteful oil and coal industries.

 

Mr. Sen:  May I remind you all once again that today we have assembled to discuss the “Hydrogen Future”.  I will now call upon Mrs. Chen, who is a Technical Specialist from Hydrogen Australia, to give a brief outline. 

 

Mrs. Chen:  Thank you, Mr. Chairman.  The first point to note is the complete feasibility of the Hydrogen Future – there are no theoretical or practical limitations.  In brief: in the long run we shall be converting sea-water, or brackish water, ice or freshwater, to hydrogen and oxygen using electrolytic processes.  In the short term, we can produce hydrogen with chemical methods like passing steam over red-hot coke.  Hydrogen can also be made from biological processes.  Water is composed of two atoms of hydrogen, and one of oxygen. Energy is required to break up the water molecule to hydrogen and oxygen.  When the hydrogen and oxygen are combined to form water once again, energy is released.  It so happens that by weight, hydrogen provides more energy than any other fuel.  One kilogram of hydrogen, upon efficient conversion, provides up to 39 KiloWattHours of energy and – also, very importantly - ten liters of water.   All this was well known.  There even is a hydrogen pipeline constructed in Germany, which was 50 kilometers long.  That was used just to supply hydrogen to the nearby chlorine industry, and it has worked well for over 50 years.  However, the main focus in recent times has been the use of hydrogen as a fuel to replace fuels derived from crude oil.  A great deal of research and development has taken place in methods relating to store and transport hydrogen.  The big problem, however, remained unsolved – hydrogen would remain significantly more costly than fossil fuels.  There seemed no getting around the fundamental fact that hydrogen would always cost more than fossil fuel, with the conventional paradigms.  Then Mr. Arindam Banerjee, a resident of Melbourne, and CEO of Adda Enterprises, presents the idea of the Hydrogen Transmission Network, as a new means to distribute energy from various sources, and to provide pure water as well, as a bonus!  What essentially would result from this idea is truly mass scale production and consumption of hydrogen, without need for the conventional storage and transportation stages, as it would now be a fast, direct, smooth flow process.  Of course, to provide steady supply to the users, there would need for stockpiling of hydrogen in large containers.  Those containers, primarily used for controlling the supply of hydrogen to the network, would be the cheap and steady source of hydrogen as fuel for transportation.  Since energy for domestic, farm and industrial consumption would come for hydrogen, the logic of scale would pull down the prices and make them very favourable with respect to those of fuels derived from fossils.  A further boost for the Hydrogen Transmission Network is the need to provide optical fibre to the home, for very high speed broadband telecommunications.  Telecom companies are eager to cut their installation costs, and are very happy to work with Hydrogen