Humane Charities List 

"Primum  non  nocere"  (Latin)  -  Hippocrates.  "First, do no harm."

Ethics

Home
About
List of Charities
Take Action
Ethics
Science
Medical History
Statistics
Submissions
Supporters
Standards
Contact Us

 

The Ethical Argument                                   

“When are experiments on animals justified?  Upon learning of the nature of many contemporary experiments, many people react by saying that all experiments on animals should be abolished immediately. But if we make our demands as absolute as this, the experimenters have a ready reply: Would we be prepared to let thousands of humans die if they could be saved by a single experiment on a single animal?

This question is, of course, purely hypothetical. There never has been and there never could be a single experiment that saves thousands of lives. The way to reply to this hypothetical question is to pose another: Would the experimenter be prepared to carry out his experiment on a human orphan under six months old if that were the only way to save thousands of lives?

If the experimenter would not be prepared to use a human infant, then his readiness to use non-human animals reveals an unjustifiable form of discrimination on the basis of species, since adult apes, monkeys, dogs, cats, rats and other mammals are more aware of what is happening to them, more self-directing, and, so far as we can tell, at least as sensitive to pain as a human infant.”

Peter Singer, Animal Liberation

Photo: Courtesy PETA USA


Copyright © 2004 AAHR
Last modified: June 23, 2005