Love, Medicine & Miracles

This excerpt
is taken from Dr. Bernie Siegel's book, Love, Medicine & Miracles, published by
Harper & Row, Publishers, 1986.
THE HEALING PARTNERSHIP
Mr. Wright, a client of psychologist Bruno Klopfer in 1957, had far-advanced
lymphosarcoma. All known treatments had become ineffective. Tumors the size of oranges
littered his neck, armpits, groin, chest and abdomen. His spleen and liver were enormously
enlarged. The thoracic lymph duct was swollen closed, and one to two quarts of milky
liquid had to be drained from his chest each day. He had to have oxygen to breathe, and
his only medicine now was a sedative to help him on his way.
Despite his state, Mr. Wright still had hope. He'd heard of a new
drug called Krebiozen, which was to be evaluated at the clinic where he lay. He didn't
qualify for the program, because the experimenters wanted subjects with a life expectancy
of at least three and preferably six months. Wright begged so hard, however, that
Klopfer decided to give him one injection on Friday, thinking he would be dead by Monday
and the Krebiozen could be given to someone else. Klopfer was in for a surprise:
I had left him febrile, gasping for air, completely
bedridden. Now, here he was, walking around the ward, chatting happily with the
nurses, and spreading his message of good cheer to any who would listen. Immediately I
hastened to see the others...No change, or change for the worse was noted. Only in
Mr.Wright was there a brilliant improvement. The tumor masses had melted like snowballs on
a hot stove, and in only these few days, they were only half their original size! This is,
of course, far more rapid regression than most radio-sensitive tumors could display under
heavy X-ray given each day. And we already knew his tumors were no longer sensitive to
irradiation. Also, he had had no other treatment outside the single useless
"shot".
This phenomenon demanded an explanation, but not only that, it
almost insisted that we open our minds to learn, rather than try to explain. So, the
injections were given three times weekly as planned, much to the joy of the
patient.....Within 10 days he was able to be discharged from his "deathbed,"
practically all signs of his disease having vanished in this short time. Incredible as it
sounds, this "terminal" patient gasping for his last breath through an
oxygen mask was now not only breathing normally, and fully active, he took off in his own
plane and flew at 12,000 feet with no discomfort.
...[W]ithin two months, conflicting reports began to appear in
the news, all of the testing clinicians reporting no results...This disturbed Mr. Wright
considerably...[H]e was... logical and disturbed in his thinking, and he began to lose
faith in his last hope...[A]fter two months of practically perfect health, he relapsed to
his original state and became very gloomy and miserable.
But Klopfer saw an opportunity to explore what was
really going on---to find out, as he put it, how quacks achieve some of their
well-documented cures. (Remember all healing is scientific) He told Wright that Krebiozen
really was as promising as it had seemed, but that the early shipments had deteriorated
rapidly in the bottles. He told of a new superrefined, double-strength product due to
arrive tomorrow.
The news came as a great revelation to him, and Mr.
Wright, ill as he was, became his optimistic self again, eager to start over. By delaying
a couple of days before the :"shipment" arrived, his anticipation of salvation
had reached a tremendous pitch. When I announced that the new series of injections were
about to begin, he was almost ecstatic and his faith was very strong.
With much fanfare, and putting on quite an act... I administered
the first injection of the doubly potent, fresh prerperation---consisting of fresh
water and nothing more. The results of this experiment were quite unbelievable to us at
the time, although we must have had some suspicion of the remotely possible outcome to
have even attempted it at all.
Recovery from the second near-terminal state was even more
dramatic than the first. Tumor masses melted, chest fluid vanished, and he became
ambulatory, and even went back to flying again. At this time he was certainly the picture
of health. The water injections were continued, since they worked such wonders. He then
remained symptom free for over two months. At this time the final AMA announcement
appeared in the press---"Nationwide tests show Krebiozen to be a worthless drug in
treatment of cancer."
Within a few days of this report Mr.Wright was readmitted to the
hospital in extremis; his faith was now gone, his last hope vanished, and he succumbed in
less than two days.

This beautiful
story is an excerpt from Dr. Bernie Siegel's second book, Peace, Love & Healing,
published by Harper & Row Publishers, 1989.
The Physiology of Love, Joy and Optimism
In January of 1983 John Florio, a seventy-eight year old
landscape gardener, was contemplating retirement. He developed abdominal pain and
underwent a GI series, which showed an ulcer. He was treated for one month and re-x-rayed
to see if the ulcer had healed. This time, however, it was larger and looked
malignant. A biopsy revealed cancer of the stomach.
I first met John in late February when he was referred to my office for
surgery. I suggested to him that we get him into a hospital right away since I was going
on vacation, and I thought that with a rapidly advancing cancer he ought to have surgery
immediately. He looked at me and said, "You forgot something." "What did I
forget?" I asked. "It's springtime. I'm a landscape gardener, and I want to make
the world beautiful. That way, if I survive, it's a gift. If I don't, I will have left a
beautiful world."
Two weeks after my vacation, he returned to the office, saying,
"The world is beautiful, I'm ready." He looked incredibly well the night after
his surgery, with no pain or discomfort. The pathology report revealed:
"Adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated, invasive through gastric wall and into
perigastric adipose tissue. Proximal margin involved by tumor, seven of sixteen lymph
nodes positive to tumor." That simply meant he still had a lot of cancer left in him
after the operation. I explained to him that he ought to consider chemotherapy and x-ray
therapy to deal with the residual cancer. "You forget something," he said.
"What did I forget this time?" "It's still spring. I don't have time for
all that." He was totally at peace, healed rapidly and was out of the hospital well
ahead of schedule. (His granddaughter, an oncology nurse at Yale, was fully aware of the
findings and his choice.)
Two weeks later he was back in my office, complaining that his stomach
was upset, and I thought, "Aha, it's the cancer again." It turned out to be a
virus, which I treated symptomatically, and he left my office.
In March of 1987 I arrived at my office and saw John's name in the
chart rack. "You must have the wrong chart," I said to the nurse. "No
that's the right chart," she said. "Then there must be two people with the same
name." "No, no," she insisted, "he's sitting in there." Then I
showed her his pathology report to explain why I assumed she had made a mistake. If you
think pathology reports predict the future of an individual, it wouldn't seem possible
that I could be seeing John four years after his operation. But that's who I saw when I
walked into my examine room.
I again feared that his visit would be related to cancer. Before I
could ask him anything, the first words out of his mouth were "Don't forget,
this is only my second post-operative visit." I think he wanted to make sure the
insurance would cover it. "But why are you here?" I asked. "I have a
question," he said. "I'd like to know what you can eat after a stomach
operation." "Four years after, anything! But tell me, why are you
here?" I asked. "I have a question," he said. "I'd like to know what
you can eat after a stomach operation." I have a hernia from lifting boulders in my
landscape business." Since he refused to be admitted to the hospital, I repaired it
under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis, and he was off and running again. If he
rested at all I'd be surprised, even though he promised to have two young men do his
normal work the first few weeks after surgery.
John is one of those exceptional patients who seem to most clinicians
to defy understanding. But I have learned that all of these exceptional patients have
stories to tell and lessons to teach. It's not just a matter of being lucky or having
"well behaved" diseases (slow growing tumors, "spontaneous" remissions
and so forth). What you have to understand is that there is a biology of the individual as
well as a biology of the disease, each affecting the other. On the day of diagnosis we
don't know either well enough to use a pathology report to predict the future.
It is now six years after his surgery, and John celebrated his
eighty-third birthday recently. You have to wonder - what has happened to his cancer?
I don't know if his immune system eliminated it or if it's still in
there, enjoying John's life so much that it's going along for the ride. What I do
know is that when you look at John what you see are signs of his ability to live and love.
Still passionate about his life's work, he sends me letters with clippings about the
therapeutic value of the outdoors and an article about himself in the local newspaper that
quotes him as saying "If I find a little marigold just lying there, I feel so sorry
for it I just put a hole in the ground with my finger and plant it." The article ends
by saying "Today .... John is still on the job, planting and pruning. He
loves it. And like the legendary cowboy who proudly professes he wants to die in the
saddle with his boots on, he says when his turn comes 'I always pray that I'll die at
work, gardening.' "
Working outdoors, John maintains what I call a celestial connection,
and, like patients in the hospital who have been shown to heal faster when their room has
a view of the sky, he is healthier because of it. John is too busy living to be sick.
That's his real secret. But how, in scientific terms, do we account for him? What can we
learn from him? Is there really a philosophy of optimism, love and joy?